> daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> > Why should user-defined tables have OIDs by default?
> At this point it's just for historical reasons. There actually is a
> proposal on the table to flip the default to WITHOUT OIDS, but so far
> it's not been accepted because of worries about compatibility. See
> the pghackers archives a few weeks back.
Shall I include a patch to pg_dump that will explicitly set WITH OIDS when I
submit this SET STORAGE dumping patch?
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-02-27 06:35:18|
|Subject: Re: OIDs as keys |
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2003-02-27 01:19:32|
|Subject: Re: Index File growing big.|