From: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Rene Pijlman'" <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>, "'Barry Lind'" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues |
Date: | 2001-12-14 17:42:44 |
Message-ID: | 02f301c184c6$bcacb230$8201a8c0@inspiron |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Rene,
We are going to support both for now.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Rene Pijlman
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Barry Lind
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:18:27 -0800, you wrote:
>The only hard part is to make sure that right classes
>get built for each driver version.
I didn't follow the make vs. ant discussion very closely. Did it reach a
conclusion or some sort of consensus on the preferred build tool?
Regards,
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-15 18:00:33 | Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues |
Previous Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-12-14 17:25:16 | Re: JDBC 3.0 / JDK 1.4 build issues |