Re: histogram

Given that you are actively implementing the code that uses the 1 and 2 I
don't see how it is that egregious. When generating calculated fields it is
cleaner than the alternative:

Select trunc(distance * 10.)/10., count(*)
>From doc_ads
Group by (trunc(distance * 10.))
Order by (trunc(distance * 10.))

It would be nice if you could do:

Select trunc(distance * 10.)/10. AS bin, count(*) AS frequency
>From doc_ads
Group by bin
Order by bin

But I do not believe that is allowed (though I may have my syntax wrong...)

David J.

>> re: 1 and 2. They're horrible (imho) reference to the attributes of the
returned tuple. Or at best an exposure of the implementation. :)

>>Joel Reymont wrote:
>>> I think this should do what I want
>>>
>>> select trunc(distance * 10.)/10., count(*)
>>> from doc_ads
>>> group by 1 order by 1
>>>
>>> Thanks, Joel