| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Date: | 2003-03-06 02:04:58 |
| Message-ID: | 028201c2e384$ca0b1f70$6500a8c0@fhp.internal |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> I think we should stick with the existing naming convention. The only
> actual problem that's been pointed out here is that an ALTER TABLE
> (or COLUMN) RENAME on a serial column doesn't update the sequence name
> to match. Seems to me we could fix that with less effort than any of
> these solutions would take, and it wouldn't break existing applications.
Non-colliding? Otherwise, it'd be ludicrous to fail a table rename because
a sequence with the new name already exists...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-06 02:08:59 | Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Previous Message | Bob Calco | 2003-03-06 01:58:35 | Re: XML ouput for psql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-06 02:08:59 | Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-06 01:55:03 | Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names |