| From: | "Tony Simopoulos" <karkalis(at)earthling(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects |
| Date: | 2000-10-25 15:15:26 |
| Message-ID: | 020b01c03e96$674d2760$0382a8c0@metavera.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
sorry,
i must have missed something. when did outer join's start working? is there a patch that i can build?
tonys.
> That's a good thought. It'd be a useful practice to review such
> standard queries from time to time anyway. For example, now that
> outer joins work, a lot of psql's backslash-command queries could
> be simplified (don't need the UNION ALL WITH SELECT NULL hack).
>
> Anyone have time to work up a list?
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-10-25 15:21:45 | 7.0.x RPMs |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2000-10-25 15:02:17 | RE: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-25 15:50:45 | Re: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2000-10-25 15:02:17 | RE: Re: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects |