Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Full Outer Joins

From: John Taylor <postgres(at)jtresponse(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,John Taylor <postgres(at)jtresponse(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Joel Burton" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com>,"PgSQL Novice ML" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Full Outer Joins
Date: 2002-05-27 19:05:07
Message-ID: 0205272005070B.01493@splash.hq.jtresponse.co.uk (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Monday 27 May 2002 20:02, Tom Lane wrote:

> 
> If that actually has the behavior you want, then that's the way you
> write it.  Placing restrictions inside an outer join is not semantically
> the same as placing them outside (at the WHERE clause), so it wasn't
> clear to me exactly what you wanted.
> 

Ah, that explains why I couldn't figure it out.
I think I need to move on from my current Postgres Bible, it stops short of
full outer joins :-(

Thanks
JohnT

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Sharon CowlingDate: 2002-05-28 06:27:45
Subject: Re: Copy Comand question
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-05-27 19:02:36
Subject: Re: Full Outer Joins

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group