>From my experience, it *** is *** impossible. I would be glad if somebody
told me different, but to my understanding the doc is wrong here.

Andreas

>>     Currently  only  'null'  and  'single  value'.  The  executor
>>     doesn't  accept anything else for non-sql language functions.
>>     PL functions are treated by the executor like 'C'  functions.
>
>Actually what I understood from the docs was thatit is 'terribly complicated' and 'beyond the
>scope of this tutorial', but not impossible ;)

Responses

• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: PL/PgSQL discussion at 1998-03-19 17:10:46 from Jan Wieck

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-03-19 16:19:10
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] tables >2GB
Previous:	From: Thomas G. Lockhart	Date: 1998-03-19 15:42:43
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timezone problems / HAVE_INT_TIMEZINE