Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: MS-VC build patch

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MS-VC build patch
Date: 2006-06-26 17:34:58
Message-ID: 019801c69946$d8d36190$0d01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Umm, It is strange.. I think that you have another config.h.?
I look at much error by the reason for being realistic.
I will become on tomorrow night, since I am not in the machine 
which can work now.

Hiroshi Saito

From: "Magnus Hagander"

> Hi Bruce-san.
> It does not help me yet. He uses VC2005.:-( It seems that 
> furthermore, it is still in the middle of work.
> One problem is visible to the next.(win32.mak)
> +   if not exist pg_config_os.h copy port\win32.h pg_config_os.h
> If VC6+ is still supported, I will submit the patch again.
> What I patch has built both the client and the server by VC6+. 

I don't think there's anything specific in my patch that should kill
VC6. What specifically does not work in VC6?

(Just reverting the whole patch doesn't seem right to me...)


In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-06-26 17:58:23
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-26 17:32:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group