Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: MS-VC build patch

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>,"Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MS-VC build patch
Date: 2006-06-26 17:34:58
Message-ID: 019801c69946$d8d36190$0d01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Umm, It is strange.. I think that you have another config.h.?
I look at much error by the reason for being realistic.
I will become on tomorrow night, since I am not in the machine 
which can work now.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

From: "Magnus Hagander"


> Hi Bruce-san.
> 
> It does not help me yet. He uses VC2005.:-( It seems that 
> furthermore, it is still in the middle of work.
> One problem is visible to the next.(win32.mak)
> +   if not exist pg_config_os.h copy port\win32.h pg_config_os.h
> If VC6+ is still supported, I will submit the patch again.
> What I patch has built both the client and the server by VC6+. 

I don't think there's anything specific in my patch that should kill
VC6. What specifically does not work in VC6?

(Just reverting the whole patch doesn't seem right to me...)

//Magnus

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2006-06-26 17:58:23
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-26 17:32:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group