hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through...
re-attempt

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Sent: January 02, 2003 6:16 PM
> 
> > static void
> > usage(void)
> > {
> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", longOption, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", shortOption, desc)
> > #endif
> > 
> > ... lots of xo() calls ...
> > 
> > #undef xo
> > }
> > 
> > This gives us the convenience of a very short name within the usage()
> > subroutines, while not polluting the namespace for everyplace else in
> > these utilities.
> 
> Revised patch attached as per above.
> 
> -s

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Serguei Mokhov	Date: 2003-01-04 00:14:17
	Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-01-03 23:31:41
	Subject: Re: Upgrading rant.

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2003-01-04 10:27:21
	Subject: Re: Fix for HP-UX shared library builds
Previous:	From: Patric Bechtel	Date: 2003-01-03 15:20:01
	Subject: New Patch for streaming result sets, now Nicks last patch incorporated