Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary

From: "Chris Travers" <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary
Date: 2004-01-10 03:12:20
Message-ID: 018301c3d730$b7f8e510$97285e3d@winxp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> Yes I did see that. Actually from what I know of the GPL, this could very
> well be the case.
>
The GPL specifically allows non-Free/Open Source components to talk to GPL'd
applications via pipes and sockets. I am assuming here that network sockets
are included, so there is NO copyright reason that, were the protocol
reverse engineered that a third-party mysql driver couldn't be written. Of
course, you could NOT use the MySQL source to do it.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2004-01-10 03:48:58 Counterproposal, re: IMPORTANT: A temporary list for Strategic
Previous Message Rob Napier 2004-01-10 02:30:27 Re: A cohesive sales message