Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reference problem of manifest.(win32.mak of libpq.dll)
Date: 2008-01-10 15:29:53
Message-ID: 017a01c8539d$a66e3370$0d01a8c0@yourc3ftrhkaod (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>

>> I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced 
>> officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
> 
> Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
> 
> But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?

It is because it is saved by it although VC6 is private. probably, present all will 
be possible by it. I feel that it is better than exclusion for it.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-10 15:49:28
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-01-10 15:28:03
Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group