From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>> I don't think of a good idea. However, since our document has announced
>> officially, saying >=VC7.1. Therefore, I think that it is satisfactory.
> Ah, good point, I forgot about that.
> But - if we do that, why do we need that IF check *at all*?
It is because it is saved by it although VC6 is private. probably, present all will
be possible by it. I feel that it is better than exclusion for it.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-10 15:49:28|
|Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2008-01-10 15:28:03|
|Subject: Re: Revised patch for fixing archiver shutdown behavior|