| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "RPK" <rohitprakash123(at)indiatimes(dot)com>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NPGSQL/ODBC performance |
| Date: | 2007-02-26 18:28:47 |
| Message-ID: | 017501c759d3$f420cbb0$c701a8c0@wiseknot.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi.
I do not understand it for the reasons why Npgsql has the connection pool.
The difference might certainly extend depending on how to unite the application.
Perhaps, I think that you have information and the numerical value of the
environment. Someone's answer might be able to be obtained by presenting it.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
----- Original Message -----
From: "RPK"
>
> I noticed working on VB.NET/PostgreSQL fast with ODBC as compared to NPGSQL.
> Why?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/NPGSQL-ODBC-performance-tf3293894.html#a9162233
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - odbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Saito | 2007-02-26 18:31:48 | Re: FAQ? |
| Previous Message | David Gardner | 2007-02-26 18:22:51 | FAQ? |