Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,"Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>,"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-25 16:25:55
Message-ID: 017101c8ee73$1d81ba70$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi.

I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still required.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/
However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me. 

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>


> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
>> Windows users also.
>> The idea is to get to the situation 
>> 
>> createlang plproxy mydb
>> 
>> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
>> like to hear how.
> 
> If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course
> that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-07-25 16:28:05
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2008-07-25 15:42:53
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group