| From: | "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
| Date: | 2008-07-25 16:25:55 |
| Message-ID: | 017101c8ee73$1d81ba70$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still required.
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/
However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
>> Windows users also.
>> The idea is to get to the situation
>>
>> createlang plproxy mydb
>>
>> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
>> like to hear how.
>
> If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course
> that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-07-25 16:28:05 | Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-07-25 15:42:53 | Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support. |