Re: Connecting remotely.

From: "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connecting remotely.
Date: 2000-11-01 16:40:18
Message-ID: 016401c04422$6b8db600$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

What's the difference between having the client use ADO to talk to the
database as opposed to an interface using the postgresql client libraries?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergio A. Kessler" <sak(at)tribctas(dot)gba(dot)gov(dot)ar>
To: <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com>; <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely.

> "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> el día Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:52:35
> -0500, escribió:
>
> [...]
> >
> >What are people's thoughts?
>
> people's thoughts are that you really want to design a multi-thier
> design (for example a 3 layer design), where
>
> / client1 (browser)
> database <---> bussines rules - client2 (browser)
> (ie. apache, php,...) \ .....
>
>
> if your client has direct access to the database, you design is broken...
>
> sergio

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message matthew denner 2000-11-01 16:45:39 does the 7.0.2 JDBC driver support absolute()
Previous Message Adam Lang 2000-11-01 16:37:34 Re: Postgresql 7.0.2 + psqlodbc