Process 1 (massive update): update table A set column1=0, column2=0
Process 2 (multiple delete): perform delete_row(user_name, column1, column2)
from table A where user_name=YYY
The pgsql function delete_row delete the row and do other business logic not
related to table A.
De: Claudio Freire [mailto:klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com]
Enviado el: viernes, 05 de octubre de 2012 10:27 a.m.
Para: Jeff Janes
CC: Anibal David Acosta; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The bulk update could take an Exclusive (not Access Exclusive) lock.
> Or the delete could perhaps be arranged to delete the records in ctid
> order (although that might still deadlock). Or you could just repeat
> the failed transaction.
How do you make pg update/delete records, in bulk, in some particular order?
(ie, without issuing separate queries for each record)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: virag||Date: 2012-10-07 13:49:23|
|Subject: UPDATE execution time is increasing|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-10-05 16:33:53|
|Subject: Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete|