Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Makefile.PL for Pg.so
Date: 2001-08-26 05:05:09
Message-ID: 01082601050901.01667@lowen.wgcr.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
On Saturday 25 August 2001 19:18, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> AFAICT, Pg.so does get the runpath set correctly.  Are you saying it
> doesn't work on your system or do you want to get rid of the
> recompilation during installation?

Pg.so does not get the proper RPATH in a DESTDIR build environment.

Trying to fix this for the RPMS -- the RPATH contains the buildroot instead 
of where the libs really are.  Could cause security problems.  Working on it, 
but it's slow going for me at this busy time.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-08-26 05:49:38
Subject: Re: version 1 C-Language Functions documentation and ex ample
Previous:From: Gowey, GeoffreyDate: 2001-08-26 03:05:56
Subject: RE: version 1 C-Language Functions documentation and example

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-08-26 07:58:50
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #428: Another security issue with the JDBC driver.
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-08-26 01:06:25
Subject: Re: Bug #428: Another security issue with the JDBC driver.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group