Re: Postgres problem when compiling C++ in Red Hat 6.2

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: "Mike S(dot) Nowostawsky" <mikenowo(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres problem when compiling C++ in Red Hat 6.2
Date: 2001-05-18 18:13:04
Message-ID: 01051814130404.00909@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 18 May 2001 00:51, Mike S. Nowostawsky wrote:
> I also tried to get the upgrades to Postgres for 6.2, but they won't
> install successfully.

Details? As I built the PostgreSQL set for 6.2 on a 6.2 box, I am very
curious as to the details. Have you updated to at least RPM 3.0.5?

> sql_test.c++:7: pgsql/libpq++.h: No such file or directory

> Any idea what the correct syntax is for the compile statement for Red Hat
> 6.2 compared

libpq++.H instead of libpq++.h on out-of-the-box Red Hat 6.2, IIRC.

- --
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7BWYz5kGGI8vV9eERAvbrAKCc0h2ooiox8mc6dB/5V9ExxWWocgCg8QMI
l7GcnWfqbJHNE3m9titD1yE=
=9LD6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Smith 2001-05-18 18:48:02 Vacuum Failed - backend closed the channel unexpectedly
Previous Message Miguel Gonzalez 2001-05-18 18:07:14 password politic