Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch

From: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch
Date: 2001-01-19 01:38:26
Message-ID: 0101182038260L.02219@comptechnews (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
I worked on the ORDER BY paragraphs some more. See what you think of it now. 
The patch is attached. :)


On Thursday 18 January 2001 18:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I know this SQL Guide has been discussed, but what should be done with
> > this patch?
>
> I believe he's going to revise it to address Tom Lane's suggestions.

-- 
-------- Robert B. Easter  reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com ---------
-- CompTechNews Message Board http://www.comptechnews.com/ --
-- CompTechServ Tech Services http://www.comptechserv.com/ --
---------- http://www.comptechnews.com/~reaster/ ------------

Attachment: syntax.sgml.patch.3
Description: text/english (23.2 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert B. EasterDate: 2001-01-19 01:51:41
Subject: Re: Pl/pgSQL & TRANSACTION
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-01-18 23:48:54
Subject: Re: docs: syntax.sgml patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-01-19 02:58:34
Subject: s_lock.h cleanup
Previous:From: Gunnar R|nningDate: 2001-01-19 00:53:57
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Fixes and enhancements to JDBC driver (take 2)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group