Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Loose check was corrected of win32.mak.
Date: 2007-10-02 10:04:25
Message-ID: 00fe01c804db$9cc208d0$c601a8c0@HP22720319231 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> + !MESSAGE nmake ended....
> + !ERROR Make aorted.
> 
> 
> Apart from the spelling error on the second line, do we need the first line
> at all? It kind of says the same thing, but does nmake require a fixed
> number of rows or so? If not, I'll just take that away before committing.

Ahhh...
!ERROR Make aorted.

Yeah Ok, Please only it.
Thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-10-02 10:23:10
Subject: Re: ecpg thread-safe descriptor
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2007-10-02 09:55:25
Subject: Re: ecpg thread-safe descriptor

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group