| From: | "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Alexandr" <AVShutko(at)mail(dot)khstu(dot)ru>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres bug (working with iserverd) |
| Date: | 2001-05-15 06:57:58 |
| Message-ID: | 00c301c0dd0c$69ef2440$4a79583f@sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> > How subselects run queries again and again?
>
> They don't end and restart them; they just rescan them. If we had
Thanks for recollection.
> this substitute-a-new-tuple hack integrated into the Param mechanism,
> then EvalPlanQual could use ExecReScan too, but at the moment no...
I see.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 13:52:16 | Re: Segfault in pgsql, Sparc Solaris 2.7, Postgresql 7.1.1 |
| Previous Message | Paul McGarry | 2001-05-15 06:47:30 | RE: Segfault in pgsql, Sparc Solaris 2.7, Postgresql 7.1.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Seidel | 2001-05-15 07:05:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Internet is putting lot of competition fire & heat under Microsoft SQL Server |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2001-05-15 06:19:01 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib |