Sure? I don't see it. In fact, I only see it in the 'SQL92 features we
don't have section'.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mistake in sql99 compatibility?
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but
> > TODO says we don't...
> TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2002-06-29 17:49:56|
|Subject: Re: Are these groups "unauthorized"?|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2002-06-29 01:14:17|
|Subject: Re: Object Oriented Features|