Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dates and year 2000

From: "Andy Marden" <amarden(at)usa(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Dates and year 2000
Date: 2002-02-21 07:59:38
Message-ID: 007301c1baad$b60d7b90$0100000a@marden1 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-sql
Do we have a workaround for 7.1.3? I don't really want to risk
an upgrade at this stage in the system

Cheers

Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andy Marden" <amarden(at)usa(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Dates and year 2000


> "Andy Marden" <amarden(at)usa(dot)net> writes:
> > Is this a bug?
>
> Yes.  It's fixed in 7.2 ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>


In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Andy MardenDate: 2002-02-21 09:27:31
Subject: Re: Dates and year 2000
Previous:From: Angus LeesDate: 2002-02-21 03:34:41
Subject: (plpgsql) DECLARE foo NUMERIC(5,2): syntax error at "("

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Henry HollandDate: 2002-02-21 09:25:58
Subject: Changing column constraints?
Previous:From: Rajesh Kumar MallahDate: 2002-02-21 07:33:00
Subject: OT: duplicate emails...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group