From:
"Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
To:
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
"PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Date:
2001-06-06 21:45:57
Message-ID:
005e01c0eed2$1248d600$dad410ac@jecw2k1 (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2001-06-01 06:31:51 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-01 15:04:10 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-01 17:18:07 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-01 22:33:30 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-02 22:14:41 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-02 23:26:12 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-03 03:22:44 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-09 22:15:54 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-09 22:18:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-09 22:20:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-02 14:49:11 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-02 15:04:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-03 15:18:20 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-03 17:17:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-06 21:45:57 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-06 22:10:00 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-07 05:09:05 from "Joe Conway" <joe(dot)conway(at)mail(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:27 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:20:02 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:31 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 05:09:35 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-07 14:16:33 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-08 04:06:05 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-08 16:09:50 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-09 01:28:20 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-09 04:31:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-10 02:26:52 from "Joe Conway" <joe(at)conway-family(dot)com>
2001-06-12 01:44:53 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 01:45:31 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 02:32:14 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-12 02:34:53 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-14 02:52:59 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-11 04:57:21 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-12 16:01:23 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-12 16:15:22 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-13 17:22:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-13 21:14:38 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2001-06-14 01:19:52 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-14 01:27:20 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2001-06-14 01:37:00 from "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
2001-06-14 01:40:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
> where the semantics are that an entire tuple of the relation "rel" is
> passed to the function. This doesn't really gain us anything for the
> problem at hand (and we'll quite likely have to give it up anyway when
> we implement schemas, since SQL has very different ideas about what
> a.b.c means than our current parser does).
>
I wasn't quite sure if there are changes I can/should make to
has_table_privilege based on this discussion. Is there any action for me on
this (other than finishing the regression test and creating documentation
patches)?
Thanks,
-- Joe
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Alex PilosovDate: 2001-06-06 21:58:52Subject : Re: [HACKERS] something smells badPrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2001-06-06 21:26:44Subject : Re: Idea: quicker abort after loss of client connection
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-06-06 22:10:00Subject : Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal Previous :From : Bruce MomjianDate : 2001-06-06 21:15:40Subject : Finalize large object patch
