Re: Fwd: Re: Call for port reports

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-30 12:36:14
Message-ID: 005b01c39ee2$68826780$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Philip Yarra" <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

> Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> writes:
> > I've just tried the latest CVS on Tru64 (OSF) and I'm getting a
surprising=
> > number of failures.
>
> You seem to have some path problems: most of the errors look like
>
> + ERROR: could not access file "/regress.so": No such file or directory
>
> or collateral damage. Check to see if the sed script that inserts path
> values into the regression scripts is doing the right things.
>

I didn't see these objects actually made in the make log, although getting
past all the warnings was painful, so maybe I missed it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vatsal Avasthi 2003-10-30 14:35:22 Deadlock problem
Previous Message Michele Bendazzoli 2003-10-30 12:35:34 Bug in Rule+Foreing key constrain?