Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: "James William Pye" <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>,"James Robinson" <jlrobins(at)socialserve(dot)com>,"Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Hackers Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?
Date: 2006-02-26 18:36:01
Message-ID: 005a01c63b03$80a27930$0f01a8c0@zaphod (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
James William Pye wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:08:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That design is broken on its face, as the system does not guarantee to
>> call the validator.
>
> Hrm. Other than language creations that do not specify a validator, at 
> what
> times will Postgres not call the validator upon function creation?

SET check_function_bodies = off;


Best Regards,
Michael Paesold 



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew - SupernewsDate: 2006-02-26 18:37:46
Subject: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
Previous:From: James William PyeDate: 2006-02-26 18:30:12
Subject: Re: Pl/Python -- current maintainer?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group