Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Greg Stark'" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: <andrew(at)supernews(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the INET/CIDR mess
Date: 2006-01-25 17:00:45
Message-ID: 005601c621d0$e26b39f0$0a0a0a0a@aus.pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> I wonder if this would be an opportunity to fix Postgres's handling
>> of addresses like '10.1'.
>
> You've mistaken this for a proposal to change the I/O behavior, which
> it is specifically not.
>
>> The standard interpretation of this is the same as '10.0.0.1'.
>
> Standard according to whom? Paul Vixie evidently doesn't think that
> that's a standard abbreviation, else the code we borrowed from libbind
> would do it already.

We had a **LONG** discussion on the I/O formats back in the 7.2 timeframe.
the current
behavior is the result of that.

Please do **NOT** change the I/O formats.

LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-01-25 17:01:12 Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-01-25 16:55:58 looking for explination of bad estimates