| From: | "John Huttley" <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PGSQL-Interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] libpq, large Objects |
| Date: | 1999-06-22 04:42:52 |
| Message-ID: | 005601bebc69$b235a280$1401a8c0@Mr_Creosote.MWK.co.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Huttley <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: PGSQL-Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Date: Monday, 21 June 1999 11:30
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] libpq, large Objects
>"John Huttley" <john(at)mwk(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
>> How do you destroy a large_object?
>
>lo_unlink(oid_of_large_object)
Thanks
>> AFAIK, the only way to do it is to put its OID into a tuple in a table
and
>> then delete that tuple.
>
>AFAIK, that will *not* remove the LO, just the referencing tuple ...
>
Thats pretty weird. Would Vaccum detect and remove orphaned OID's?
Regards
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Huttley | 1999-06-22 04:45:49 | Re: [INTERFACES] libpq, large Objects |
| Previous Message | selkovjr | 1999-06-22 00:46:39 | Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation |