From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:14:59PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi. Sorry about the delay in the response.
No problem. thanks.
>> I needed other programs, in order to test what always built independent
>> Therefore, environment was considered variously. Then, I thought that a
>> sample program was helpful. They are written to the document.
>> I understood that test example could not compile by MinGW (gcc).
>> Furthermore, there was a problem of some MS-VC+. and, some difference was
>> in the document and the program. However, It is not a problem in the reason
>> a document is explanation in standard environment. probably.
>> testlibpq4.c does not have description in a document. and, a program
>> comment and operation were not in agreement...Therefore, a little change
>> was given. I thinks that it is enough, in order to show an example.
>> error happen before patch apply.
>> I was able to do the satisfactory test after
>> However, only compile was performed by the reason AMD64 does not have test
>> Please take this into consideration.
> I'm not sure we want to keep sticking these external makefiles for things.
> We specifically tried to get rid of a couple of those for 8.3 in other
Ahh, If it becomes surely, I will desire to continue making psql from a pair for libpq.
I always try actual operation, in order to check the accuracy of nmake independent libpq.
> I'm fine with the quick-fixes for the build.
> Why do you comment out a couple of lines from testlo.c?
Ooooops, sorry...It was mistaken in confusion of work.
"pickout" and "overwrite" also comment out the document so that they may see confusion
of a result. Therfore, The same one as a document thought that it was good.
> Comments from others?
Description: application/octet-stream (1.0 KB)
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Stefan Schwarzer||Date: 2008-01-24 13:41:25|
|Subject: Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine|
|Previous:||From: Jonah H. Harris||Date: 2008-01-23 21:19:18|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Including Snapshot Info with Indexes|