On Saturday, November 17, 2012 3:35 AM Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Have you considered ALTER SYSTEM SET ... ? We'd talked about that in
> > the context of the other patch, but it seems to fit much more
> > with this one. Or maybe ALTER GLOBAL SET or ALTER ALL SET.
> I would paint that one ALTER SYSTEM SET and the file based one ALTER
> CONFIGURATION SET. No new keyword were armed in that proposal.
One more could be to have built-in function
level - PG_NEW_CONNECTION
Level will distinguish how and when the value will be used.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2012-11-17 13:30:27|
|Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v3 - comparison to Postgres-R
change set format|
|Previous:||From: Amit Kapila||Date: 2012-11-17 13:25:34|
|Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL|