Oliver Jowett wrote:
> I'm actually tempted to drop the pooling DataSource implementations
> altogther. Does anyone on the list actually use these? I think the
> more common approach is for a higher layer to use our
> ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation (or plain DataSource, even)
> plus their own pooling logic..
I certainly do use Jdbc3PoolingDataSource, and would hate to see it go away.
The Easiest Way to Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: José Carlos Stevenson||Date: 2004-07-16 15:10:16|
|Subject: Re: SSL Problem|
|Previous:||From: Aaron Mulder||Date: 2004-07-16 12:50:59|
|Subject: Re: Adding JDK1.5 removing 1.1 support.|