I'm agreeing with the people like SePICK and erServer.
I'm only being sort of cheeky in saying that they wouldn't have had a
product had
it not been for the Open Source that they are leveraging off  of.
Making money? I don't know what they're plans are, but at some point I would
fully expect *someone* to make money.



----- Original Message -----
From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Gary MacDougall" <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com>
Cc: "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>; "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>; "Thomas
Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>; "Don Baccus"
<dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>; "PostgreSQL Development"
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version


> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote:
>
> > > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from
> > > uncompensated parties, then you have the unambiguous right to do what
> > > ever you want.
> >
> > Thats a given.
>
> okay, then now I'm confused ... neither SePICK or erServer are derived
> from uncompensated parties ... they work over top of PgSQL, but are not
> integrated into them, nor have required any changes to PgSQL in order to
> make it work ...
>
> ... so, where is this whole outcry coming from?
>
>

In response to

• Re: beta testing version at 2000-12-04 00:53:08 from The Hermit Hacker

Responses

• Re: beta testing version at 2000-12-04 03:18:00 from The Hermit Hacker

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Gary MacDougall	Date: 2000-12-04 03:06:25
	Subject: Re: beta testing version
Previous:	From: Thomas Lockhart	Date: 2000-12-04 02:16:08
	Subject: Re: beta testing version