Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Similar querys, better execution time on worst execution plan

From: SZUCS Gábor <surrano(at)mailbox(dot)hu>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Similar querys, better execution time on worst execution plan
Date: 2003-06-26 15:06:32
Message-ID: 003f01c33bf4$87c41720$0403a8c0@fejleszt4 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
*happy* :)))

G.
------------------------------- cut here -------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fernando Papa" <fpapa(at)claxson(dot)com>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:33 PM


I need to recheck about the "quality" of "active" field. Really I don't know
if I found a lot of 'S', a lot of 'N', maybe we will have 50%/50% of 'S' or
'N'. This will be important to define index.

Thanks for your answer.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Manfred KoizarDate: 2003-06-26 15:51:56
Subject: Re: problem with pg_statistics
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-26 14:08:05
Subject: Re: problem with pg_statistics

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group