Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 16:49 -0700, Ed L. wrote:
>> The attached dbsize patch:
>> + makes relation_size(relname) include toast tables;
>> + adds aggregate_relation_size(relname) to count table data and indices;
>> + adds indices_size(relname) to report the size of indices for a
>> I've minimally tested it against PostgreSQL 8.1devel on
>> compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5).
> Barring any objections, I'll apply this to HEAD tomorrow.
Perhaps you could rename indices_size to indexes_size. A quick google search
on "site:postgresql.org indices" and "site:postgresql.org indexes" shows
that indices is used much less (7,080) than indexes (23,400). Top hits for
indices are 7.1 docs, for indexes it's 7.3 and 7.4.
It seems to me that indexes is the term more commonly used with postgresql.
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-01-27 07:08:30|
|Subject: Re: dbsize patch|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-01-27 06:53:33|
|Subject: Re: Move get_grosysid() to utils/cache/lsyscache.c|