Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

From: "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Mount" <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649(at)dis(dot)ulpgc(dot)es>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
Date: 2000-02-05 08:03:38
Message-ID: 003b01bf6faf$82e88660$0100a8c0@kpi.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

That sounds awesome!

Thanks for all the good work.

Regards,
Joe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Joe Shevland'" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au>; "Peter Mount" <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>; "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649(at)dis(dot)ulpgc(dot)es>;
<pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 4:51 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)

> New in the 7.0 driver:
> * javax.sql support (thanks arkin)
> * Transaction Isolation (should have been in 6.5.3, but got missed)
> * dutch translation of errors
> * Array support
> * The driver is now under the package org.postgresql not postgresql
> * Rewrote the Makefile
>
> These will be done by the end of this weekend:
> * LOCATOR()'s (required for BLOB & CLOB)
> * java.sql.BLOB & java.sql.CLOB support
> * The way our type extensions will support the standard way introduced
> in JDBC2.0
> * Copy support (finally)
> * InputStream & OutputStream support for Large Objects
> * Translations of error messages for some other languages (using
> babelfish)
> * New ImageViewer example
> * Rewritten blob example
>
> And possible if I get chance before 7.0 is released (in order of
> priority):
> * StarOffice support (both Linux & Windog)
> * Implement the JAVA_OBJECT data type
> * Implement Structure support
> * CallableStatement
> * ResultSet to use a cursor when retrieving results
>
> These won't be done until after 7.0:
> * RowSet's
> * Updateable ResultSet's (not sure how to do this yet)
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Shevland [mailto:shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 6:39 PM
> To: Peter Mount; 'Jaume Pausas'; pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> Oi oi! Is 7.0 close and whats in the beast?
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> --
> Any views stated are in the hope that Peter Mount
> moves quickly on the PostgreSQL JDBC driver ;)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Mount" <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
> To: "'Jaume Pausas'" <a1649(at)dis(dot)ulpgc(dot)es>;
> <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 6:14 AM
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
>
>
> > If you mean the javax.sql standard extensions, they are in the 7.0
> > release.
> >
> > ie: I'm currently merging the supplied sources into the cvs source at
> > the moment.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > --
> > Peter Mount
> > Enterprise Support
> > Maidstone Borough Council
> > Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough
> Council.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaume Pausas [mailto:a1649(at)dis(dot)ulpgc(dot)es]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 1:16 PM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > Subject: [INTERFACES] ConnectionPoolDataSource (JDBC)
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I´ve been reading a short course about jdbc 2.0 and there put that
> some
> > drivers includes implementation of the ConnectionPoolDataSource
> > interface. Does postgresql driver include it?
> >
> > Anybody have an implementation of a spooled database?
> >
> >
> >
> > ************
> >
> > ************
> >
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Compte utilisateur Sultan-advl 2000-02-05 22:13:45 Re: BLOBS
Previous Message Ed Loehr 2000-02-05 02:20:29 Re: [INTERFACES] Bug in parser?