There is only one thing I cannotprotect myself from is my own stupidity !
Tx very much to remind me that
rue J. Wytsmanstraat 62
yahoo-id : smetsthomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Wieck" <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Sent: 25 March, 2002 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] rule problem
> tsmets(at)brutele(dot)be wrote:
> > [...]
> > I thought I could do smthg like :
> > do instead
> > begin work
> > Action_1;
> > Action_2;
> > Action_3;
> > commit work
> > Could some one suggest a better solution ?
> > I have never seen what happens if I set multiple rules.
> > Are they applied in the order they were created ?
> You cannot and don't need to do BEGIN and COMMIT as rule
> actions. Write it as
> do instead
> and the actions will be perfomed in that order, all in one
> and the same transaction.
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
> #================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Jeroen T. Vermeulen||Date: 2002-03-26 00:24:02|
|Subject: libpqxx has HTML docs|
|Previous:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2002-03-25 21:20:04|
|Subject: Re: accessing fully qualified fields in records in PLPGSQL?|