Re: TODO question

From: "Pavlo Baron" <pb(at)pbit(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO question
Date: 2001-12-28 09:15:59
Message-ID: 003301c18f80$44489d80$6500a8c0@bw1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian:
> Actually, the bigest problem with these small items is not the coding
> but making a patch everyone likes (at least for me). :-)

ok, but what's the exact process of integrating patches made by new
contributers (or smb. who tries to become a contributer, smb. like me ,-) )?
I made (and remade, thank you Tom) a patch for "Allow INSERT INTO my_table
VALUES (a, b, c, DEFAULT, x, y, z, ...)" from the TODO list being a small
nice item. How do I know if it's been accepted? I explicitely wanted to
begin with such small items, because: what looks small'n'easy for you guys
would take some time for me to implement, and if I've got it after I jogged
through the whole parser, maybe it would look small'n'easy for me, too.

rgds
Pavlo Baron

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-28 15:07:12 Re: TODO question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-12-28 05:24:23 Re: Performance problem with large insert statements