From: | "Mitch Vincent" <mvincent(at)cablespeed(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Portal question |
Date: | 2001-07-30 14:42:47 |
Message-ID: | 002e01c11905$e70a7e40$1251000a@Mitch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I've used select count(), then a select LIMIT/OFFSET for the pages.. A
cursor might be a better idea though I don't think you can get the total
number of rows without count()'ing them.
Good luck!
-Mitch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:07 AM
Subject: [HACKERS] Portal question
> Hi all,
>
> This is the situation: You are doing a big query, but you want the
results
> on the web page to be paginated. ie. The user can click page 1, 2, etc.
>
> So, you need know how many rows total would be returned, but you also only
> need a small fraction of them.
>
> What is an efficient way of doing this?
>
> It seems to me that using a CURSOR would be advantageous, however once a
> CURSOR is opened, how do you get the full row count?
>
> ie. Can you do this:?
>
> 1. Declare a cursor
> 2. Find the total number of rows returned
> 3. Fetch the subset of the rows that are required
> 4. Construct a pagination based on the info from 2 and 3.
>
> If this can't be done - how do you do it? Is the only way to repeat the
> whole query twice, the first time doing a count(*) instead of the select
> variables?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-07-30 14:43:04 | Re: Re: From TODO, XML? |
Previous Message | jgray | 2001-07-30 14:33:06 | Re: From TODO, XML? |