Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re:

From: "Darko Prenosil" <Darko(dot)Prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql interfaces" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2001-10-04 09:03:16
Message-ID: 002201c14cb3$8049ed30$ef00000a@darko (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Darko Prenosil" <Darko(dot)Prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>; "pgsql interfaces"
<pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES]
>
> I've said since day one that libpq's non-blocking mode is fundamentally
> broken --- see http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=35774 and
> rest of that thread.  Tempt me not too far, or I'll rip it all out
> until someone reimplements it in a non-broken fashion ...
>
Sorry, we did not know that "NON-BLOCKING" is in such bad shape, and only
tried to help !!!

Best regards !


In response to

  • Re: at 2001-10-03 17:41:34 from Tom Lane

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-04 13:28:06
Subject: Re:
Previous:From: Billy G. AllieDate: 2001-10-04 05:15:15
Subject: Announcing the release of pyPgSQL 1.6

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group