Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

From: A_Schnabel(at)t-online(dot)de (Andre Schnabel)
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "ML: Postgres Ports" <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compilation on Solaris 2.8
Date: 2001-07-14 10:16:26
Message-ID: 001f01c10c4e$0b276c80$0201a8c0@aschnabel.homeip.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Sorry,

I did not post in the original thread.
The message, I refere to was:
    From: Oyvind Hallsteinsen
    To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
    Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:02 PM
    Subject: [PORTS] Undefined symbols in pgsql libraries using Solaris
2.8/Sparc



----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Eisentraut
To: Andre Schnabel
Cc: ML: Postgres Ports
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Compilation on Solaris 2.8


Andre Schnabel writes:

> Does anybody know if (and how) they solved the problem of the undefined
> symbols in libpq.so.2 and plpgsql.so ?

I don't see mention of these problems in the mailing list archives.  Would
you care to repeat them?

--
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-07-14 23:27:56
Subject: Re: Undefined symbols in pgsql libraries using Solaris 2.8/Sparc
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2001-07-14 09:49:58
Subject: Re: Compilation on Solaris 2.8

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group