> >I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
> >to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:
> (not based on WAL)
> That's wasn't clear from the blurb.
> Still, this notion that PG, Inc will start producing closed-source products
> poisons the well. It strengthens FUD arguments of the "open source can't
> provide enterprise solutions" variety. "Look, even PostgreSQL, Inc realizes
> that you must follow a close sourced model
> in order to provide tools for the corporate world."
Did you miss Thomas' answer? Wasn't it clear that the order is to provide
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Gary MacDougall||Date: 2000-12-03 20:29:47|
|Subject: Re: beta testing version|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-12-03 17:10:02|
|Subject: Re: COPY BINARY is broken... |