Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

From: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: "Tom Copeland" <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>,"pgsql-advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Date: 2004-11-23 18:40:31
Message-ID: 001401c4d18b$eb35d6d0$0a01a8c0@zaphod (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Tom Copeland wrote:

> This article is up here now:
>
> http://databasejournal.com/features/postgresql/article.php/3437821
>
> Thanks to Merlin Moncure and Robert Bernier for their helpful
> suggestions, and long live PostgreSQL!


What I found quite irritating is that the forum posts below ("PostgreSQL 
Forum") are not about PostgreSQL but really MS SQL, i.e. the MS SQL forum is 
linked into this article. If you look at the available database forums, you 
will see that there is no PostgreSQL forum (but e.g. a MySQL one).

Perhaps you can point that out to the Databasejournal people so the would 
fix it.

I liked your article.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold 


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom CopelandDate: 2004-11-23 18:51:22
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?
Previous:From: Tom CopelandDate: 2004-11-23 16:30:08
Subject: Re: Anyone got time to review an article?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group