> Have we made a decision on this? I think we should apply it.
Well I'd vote for that ;-)
If Peter feels strongly about *not* including PQescapeBytea, I'll remove it
and resubmit the patch, but I would like to see it in there myself. Just let
me know want you want me to do.
I haven't seen any comments one way or the other on the rest of the patch,
but again, I'd really like to see it applied. The backend functions are all
per SQL99 (section 4.3 Binary strings, and 8.5 <like predicate>).
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2001-09-13 18:10:31|
|Subject: Re: SQLCODE==-209|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-09-13 16:57:43|
|Subject: Re: Bytea string operator support|