From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |
Date: | 1999-06-30 00:36:37 |
Message-ID: | 001201bec290$9d1300a0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 11:11 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
>
>
> We are two weeks after the 6.5 release, and the anticipated
> problems/patches/porting issues never really materialized.
>
> I would suspect that fewer people are using PostgreSQL, but I know that
> is not true. Seems the two months of beta really got out the bugs.
>
> What do people want to do now? Does anyone want to start on 6.6? Do we
> want to release 6.5.1? Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> the stable release?
>
> I am looking for comments.
>
I have 2 questions for 6.5.1.
1. Currently we couldn't create an index on numeric type.
Is it difficult to add numeric_ops ?
2. I love Oracle TRUNCATE statement.
Marcus Mascari [mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com] has already implemented
this feature,though I haven't seen his implementation yet.
If his implementation is right,could this new feature be added to
6.5.1 ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Richards | 1999-06-30 00:46:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Ability |
Previous Message | Daniele Orlandi | 1999-06-30 00:24:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Little Suggestion for 6.6 |