Re: XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report

I have installed PostgreSQL on both XP Pro and XP Home with success.

The only challenge seems to be installing PostgreSQL as a service, which can
be done effortlessly, but requires a user name with a password that can't be
blank (see attachment). I can't see any difference in doing this between
the Pro and Home editions.

Regards,
George

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <cygwin(at)cygwin(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Cygwin" <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:corinna-cygwin(at)cygwin(dot)com]
> Sent: 15 April 2003 21:07
> To: Cygwin
> Cc: Dave Page; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
>
> > Yes, XP Home had (and still has) reported problems. But, I
> don't have
> > access to XP Home, so I cannot confirm or refute them.
>
> Sorry but I don't quite understand that. XP Home is the same
> as XP Pro except for the user interface side and some minor
> services. Especially the OS kernel is the same. No missing
> calls, no different behaviour. From the Cygwin side of life,
> both are the same.

I thought I heard there were differences in the way you could specify
the user account used by services (specifically you couldn't)? I've
never used Home so may be completely off-track, but as Jason implies,
judging by posts to the pgsql-cygwin list there is definately something
different between home and pro causing the problem on home that don't
exist with pro.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org