RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "John Brothers" <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Date: 2000-01-28 07:05:18
Message-ID: 000f01bf695e$08fe7780$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org [mailto:owner-pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)
> org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
>
> Hiroshi neglected to mention that you'd probably need to drop and
> recreate the index after applying the patch; if it's indeed out of

Oops I neglected to mention it,sorry.

> order, just patching the comparator bug isn't enough to fix it.

Yes,please report us the result.
If the result is wrong,we have to think more about it.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jose Soares 2000-01-28 09:31:39 ipgsql: libmySQL.DLL not found!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-28 05:59:55 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-28 07:49:29 RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-01-28 07:01:47 RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-28 17:19:11 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-28 05:59:55 Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4