Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

CORBAservices (was RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE)

From: "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com>
To: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: CORBAservices (was RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE)
Date: 1998-11-17 18:21:52
Message-ID: 000c01be1257$2668a700$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
[ Cross-post to pgsql-interfaces ]

> BTW, what does CORBA prescribe about transactions (if anything) ?
>
> Is the current transaction model adequate or do we need nested
> transactions ?

The Query Service is read-only, so does not have locking or transactions...
We will have to implement the Transaction Service...

Current service list for our implementation: (in order of importance)

Naming Service (provided by most 2.2 ORBs)
LifeCycle Service (provided by mico) (dependent on NS)
Query Service
Security Service
ConcurrencyControl Service
Transaction Service (dependent on CCS)
Relationship Service (provided by mico)

(Not sure about the ordering of the last few...)

As you can see, this is a non-trivial list of interfaces :)

Taral


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 1998-11-17 18:26:05
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Previous:From: dkelson-list-pgsql-hackersDate: 1998-11-17 18:17:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New to PostgreSQL, is this a DoS?

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: TaralDate: 1998-11-17 18:26:05
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Previous:From: Warren CraigDate: 1998-11-17 16:36:57
Subject: ODBC and Access

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group