> At 20:30 29/06/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Oh, you're right, it does not. So you'd first have to run through the
> >table and verify that the constraint holds for each existing tuple.
> >Doesn't seem like a big deal though...
> Does this mean somebody is likely to do it? It'd certainly make
> backup/restore more reliable.
I'll take a stab at it. It might take me a while to get stuff working
but it shouldn't take too long before the beginnings are there.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Philip Warner||Date: 2000-06-30 05:27:53|
|Subject: Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-06-30 01:48:04|
|Subject: Re: Installation layout|