Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AW: Proposal: More flexible backup/restore via pg_dump

From: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)kick(dot)com>
To: "Philip Warner" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: Proposal: More flexible backup/restore via pg_dump
Date: 2000-06-30 02:15:21
Message-ID: 000901bfe239$0b054050$0c64010a@kick.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> At 20:30 29/06/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >Oh, you're right, it does not.  So you'd first have to run through the
> >table and verify that the constraint holds for each existing tuple.
> >Doesn't seem like a big deal though...
> >
> 
> Does this mean somebody is likely to do it? It'd certainly make
> backup/restore more reliable.

I'll take a stab at it. It might take me a while to get stuff working
but it shouldn't take too long before the beginnings are there.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-06-30 05:27:53
Subject: Modified pg_dump & new pg_restore need testing...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-06-30 01:48:04
Subject: Re: Installation layout

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group