RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Don Baccus" <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
Date: 2000-01-26 05:32:16
Message-ID: 000801bf67be$b490d120$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Don Baccus
>
> At 11:55 AM 1/25/00 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> >> Even default is not allowed in ADD COLUMN now.
> >> There may be other reasons why they aren't allowed.
> >
> >It's not a matter of *allowed*, it's a parsing deficiency. The fact that
> >there was a default declared gets silently ignored. If y'all allow ;) I
> >would like to fix that (have already started a bit) by perusing the code
> >in parse_func.c:transformCreateStmt and do the same for the alter table
> >add column part. Maybe and add/drop constraint will come out in
> the end as
> >well.
>
> However, heap_getattr still won't see the default since it simply
> checks to see of the attribute number falls off the end of the
> tuple and then returns null.
>

Sorry,the following question might be already answered but too
many postings for me.

Do we have to refer default value for already inserted rows ?
Doesn't 'default' have its meaning only when rows are about to be
inserted ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-26 05:46:43 Many files modified tonight
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-26 05:27:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Happy column adding and dropping