Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for better large objects support

From: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date: 2000-06-13 09:25:37
Message-ID: 00061316281907.00525@dyp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> > > > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > > > way around.
> > >
> > > Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?
> > 
> > Because data is stored in relations, and there's extra overhead for managing them.
> > Just look on Jan's mail in [HACKERS] for better description of the difference.
> 
> According to Tom's last email, current LOs are stored in relations now.

That was a part of my patch. :-)) Anyway I will try to implement one-table LO storage
for transaction integrity. Read Jan's mail.

-- 
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Karel ZakDate: 2000-06-13 09:28:37
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous:From: Chris BitmeadDate: 2000-06-13 09:19:07
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group