Re: Patch for better large objects support

From: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for better large objects support
Date: 2000-06-13 09:25:37
Message-ID: 00061316281907.00525@dyp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> > > > 2. For really large objects TOAST will be really inefficient for quite small < 64K other
> > > > way around.
> > >
> > > Why will toast be inefficient for really large objects?
> >
> > Because data is stored in relations, and there's extra overhead for managing them.
> > Just look on Jan's mail in [HACKERS] for better description of the difference.
>
> According to Tom's last email, current LOs are stored in relations now.

That was a part of my patch. :-)) Anyway I will try to implement one-table LO storage
for transaction integrity. Read Jan's mail.

--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine

----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp(at)perchine(dot)com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2000-06-13 09:28:37 Re: Big 7.1 open items
Previous Message Chris Bitmead 2000-06-13 09:19:07 Re: Patch for better large objects support