> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> >> If we are in abort state and
> >> the submitted query string is
> >> SELECT foo ; ROLLBACK ; SELECT bar
> >> it seems to me that the correct response is to reject the first select
> >> and process the second. The currently committed code does so, but
> >> your patch would fail.
> > It seems pg_parse_and_plan() returns NIL plan_list and NIL
> > querytree_list in this case.
> You're not looking at current CVS ;-)
Sorry,I see your change now.
Unfortunately I've never used multiple query and understand
little about it. For example,how to know using libpq that the first
select was ignored ?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2000-04-06 01:58:06|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Doc updates|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2000-04-06 01:24:26|
|Subject: Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified]|